NuSi-The Nutritional Science Initiave

14 Comments

Howdy folks!

I promise I’ll get some blogs up soon. I’ve been working on the 2nd book and several other projects amid changing diapers and sponging up drool! In the meantime I want to let folks know about a critical new development, the Nutritional Science Initiate founded by Gary Taubes and Dr. Peter Attia. Below is a Pdf overview of the program and an introduction.

NuSI overview

Introduction to NuSI

About Us

The Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI, or “new see”) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that facilitates and funds experimental research in nutrition with the goal of reducing the economic and social burden of obesity and obesity-related diseases. NuSI is founded on the premise that nutrition research for the past half century has failed to meet the scientific standards necessary to establish reliable knowledge on the relationship between diet and disease, and that this failure may be at least partly responsible for the current epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States and around the world. By addressing this issue with high-quality, rigorously-controlled experiments targeted at elucidating the diet-disease relationship, the leadership of NuSI believes that it can create strategies, nutritional guidance and policies that will successfully combat the rising tide of obesity and diabetes. NuSI was co-founded in February 2012 by Gary Taubes and Peter Attia, M.D. and is located in San Diego, CA. Funding for NuSI comes from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, private citizens, and like-minded organizations.

The Problem

The last four decades have seen unprecedented increases in the prevalence and incidence of both obesity and diabetes. In the early 1970s, one in seven Americans were obese and 4 million were diabetic. Today one in three Americans are obese and over 20 million have diabetes. The cost of obesity alone on the health care system is now estimated at upward of $150 billion annually.

These twin epidemics of obesity and diabetes have occurred coincident with the widespread promulgation of dietary guidelines and advice that are based in turn on two poorly tested assumptions: that healthy diets are low in fat and high in carbohydrates and that the fundamental cause of overweight and obesity is the overconsumption of food in relationship to physical activity.

Both of these assumptions are controversial and the existing research in nutrition has been inadequate to the task of determining whether or not they are correct. An alternative hypothesis that has gained increasing acceptance in the research community is that the macronutrient content of the diet – particularly the quantity and quality of the carbohydrates – plays the more critical role in both the accumulation of excess body fat and the chronic diseases that are associated with obesity.

NuSI was created to initiate and fund experimental studies that can unambiguously establish the mechanistic role of macronutrients in obesity and disease and so the fundamental nature of a healthy diet. We believe that these questions and problems are too important and too expensive both to our quality of life and our economy to allow them to continue any further without rigorous and uncompromising inquiry.

Our Strategy

NuSI has recruited a consortium of distinguished, independent scientists to design, oversee and carry out research that can unambiguously resolve the relationship between diet, obesity and chronic disease. While these researchers have divergent backgrounds and come with different perspectives on the cause of obesity, they all share in common the belief that nutritional science in its current state is inadequate; that better, more rigorous experiments must be done; and that nutritional guidance must be based on hard science, not popular opinion or consensus.

NuSI will fund the necessary experiments in collaboration with other traditional funding sources (e.g., the National Institutes of Health), and these experiments will then be carried out by researchers at institutions throughout the country and abroad. For those findings that might be contrary to conventional wisdom, NuSI will fund independent researchers to replicate, if possible, the results.

NuSI will work to assure that the results and implications of this research are fully understood by the research community as well as by public health and government organizations that disseminate dietary recommendations to the public and set policies that determine food access, availability and economics.

Our Hope

In 1970, the prevalence of obesity in the United States was less than half what it is today; the prevalence of diabetes was a fourth the current rate. It is realistic to assume that these numbers can be achieved again, and that this can be accomplished by applying the best possible science to the outstanding questions of diet, obesity and disease.

 

 

Leave A Comment

Comments

Comment using Facebook

Comment using RobbWolf.com

  1. Kathy
    September 13, 2012 at 7:55 pm

    This is so great to see!! It could be an amazing agent for change and education.

  2. Martin
    September 13, 2012 at 10:32 pm

    @Paul Bouzakis

    Gary Taubes’ fundamental bias is against bad science. What’s wrong about it?

    I doubt they would construct experiments in a way that would suggest their preferences or opinions. All of their reputation would be lost.

  3. Ginny
    September 14, 2012 at 4:31 am

    Awesome article as always. I don’t mean to sound picky, but I would post more of them if the spelling was consistently double-checked. Sorry, but it really takes away from the credibility of the articles when there are typos.

    • John
      June 6, 2014 at 4:38 pm

      Ah yes, no blog would be deemed complete without the welcomed comments from English majors, forever reminding both writers and readers about the importance of spell-check. Way to strip down the article and find the elusive problem at hand. Well done, Ginny!

      PS: I’m sure I made a typo myself, perhaps even put a comma in the wrong spot. I’ll tell you what, why not go right ahead and correct it for me. Go ahead, let me know how I can improve my comment.

  4. Scott S
    September 14, 2012 at 5:12 am

    I made the mistake of reading the ingredients on a “fruit and grain” bar my wife was feeding our 1-1/2 yr old grandson and couldn’t help but say the main ingredient is HFC and this isn’t a good food for him. Anyway, she just said she didn’t want to hear it. These studies can’t come out too soon for me. People just don’t get what all the sugar, grain etc. is doing to our health and our children’s health and if you say something, it just makes people mad. We have simply been led to believe that a “fruit and grain” bar is excellent nutrition and any one that would go against that is a crazy person!

    Scott

  5. Kimberly
    September 14, 2012 at 9:25 am

    Scott S – get the book Primal Body Primal Mind for your wife to read.

  6. Martine
    September 24, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    Exactly Martin!. I got a little frustrated reading the other articles covering this new initiative. They were all worried about Gary Taubes well known stance on low-carb. Gary Taubes has been reporting on bad science all his professional life. Even if he had direct input on the studies themselves, would he deliberately set up ambiguous experiments that can have only one outcome ? Would he do exactly what he has railed against for all those years? That would be incredibly hypocritical, and I can’t believe that of him. Yes he has his own bias. But everyone has bias, and good science is set up in such a way that it doesn’t matter. Good science results in good data, the opposite of garbage in, garbage out. All you can do at that point is fudge your interpretation of the data. And even if I believed that Gary would do pull a T. Colin Campbell, which I don’t, he would get caught in 2 minutes flat.

  7. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It if truth be told was once a leisure account it. Glance complex to far introduced agreeable from you! However, how could we communicate?

Leave a Reply