I received a great question a few days ago and wanted to look at some nuances of insulin resistance. Here is the question:
Robb:
Idea for future post. Can you explain the mechanism of insulin resistance with regard to obesity? I have learned that obesity causes insulin resistance, which leads to NIDDM. It seems counterintuitive that resistance to insulin (i.e. inefficient storage) can cause fat. Instead it should cause a release of TG from the adipose. So improving insulin sensitivity can make us fatter in the setting of a hypercaloric intake. Or, am I missing something? Why is it not optimal to have some mild insulin resistance.
Thanks
Sleepdoc
So…there is a lot going on in this question. Here are a few things to keep track of:
1-Insulin resistance is a relative phenomena, from person to person AND more importantly from TISSUE to TISSUE.
2-Insulin resistance may or may not lead to overt obesity. Obesity may or may not be characterized by insulin resistance.
In the case of insulin resistance from person to person an individual may have a “normal” glucose tolerance test and insulin response as compared to statistical averages. That person however may have characteristics of hyperinsulinemia such as high blood pressure, altered blood lipids etc. Nothing too shocking here as it’s just another way of saying that people are different. Perhaps more interesting and germane to sleepdoc’s question is the issue of insulin sensitivity from tissue to tissue. In general adipose tissue is more insulin sensitive than muscular tissue and thus stores blood glucose relatively better than does muscle. This is played out amidst complex mechanisms designed to maintain blood glucose levels within certain operating parameters. If glucose gets too high we have serious problems with advanced glycation end products (AGE’s) and a loss of valuable nutrients as the glucose spills over into the urine at the kidney level. On the other hand, if glucose gets too low we can face a life threatening situation. Even during ketosis some tissues, particularly in the brain, still require glucose.
So on one end of a spectrum we could be highly insulin sensitive (on the whole body level) and all of our blood glucose would get shuttled into the muscle and fat leaving nothing for the brain and other tissues that need a constant titration. At the other end we have extreme insulin resistance that does not allow any glucose into cells, which oddly enough results in the same phenomena as low blood glucose…no fuel is available to maintain life despite large concentrations of circulating glucose and likely a large yet inaccessible fat mass.
The above description covers the two extremes of full body (all tissues) insulin sensitivity AND full body (all tissues) insulin resistance. What happens if we are relatively more or less insulin sensitive at our more metabolically active tissue, the muscle? If we are relatively sensitive at the muscular level we will tend to deposit/uptake nutrients into the muscle. Folks who have this “problem” tend to build muscle relatively easily and tend to not gain fat even in a hypercaloric state. An extreme version of this condition is the post workout state in which insulin sensitivity is high and in fact there are mechanisms for non-insulin mediated nutrient transport. In this scenario glucose, fats and amino acids get a free ride into the muscles without the action of insulin. If we reverse this process however and decrease the sensitivity of the muscles we will tend to store nutrients in the fat mass. I THINK this is what happens in the typical hard-gainer scenario…too many carbs, too often which reduces insulin sensitivity at the muscular level and a tendency to just get doughy and soft. It’s a great look, I wore it well for many years!
With the above in mind it’s easier to explain an obese individual who has a “normal” glucose tolerance test. This individual is relatively insulin sensitive at the fat level and resistant at the muscular level…on average, more nutrients get shuttled into the fat mass. What happens if this individual becomes progressively more insulin resistant at the fat level? This individual becomes VERY hungry and will eat enough food (typically refined carbs) to elicit enough of an insulin response to get nutrients into the muscle, brain and fat. Sine the fat is the most insulin sensitive tissue for these folks, the lions share of those nutrients get sequestered into the fat mass and then the cycle starts again in 2-3 hours.
Good Calories, Bad Calories is exhaustive in it’s detail of this topic if you care to dig deeper.
Brad says
Great write up… thank you.
Brad
Matt Metzgar says
Robb,
I too have wondered if there is a hargainer-insulin resistance connection. I think far too little attention has been paid to this issue. After all, if a hardgainer is taking in extra calories, and they aren’t being directed to muscle, then where are they going? The insulin is most likely diverting them to fat. So eating more carbs, or just eating more in general isn’t going to solve the problem and create any muscle.
Matt-
Exactly, and this is the counter intuitive element of intermittent fasting. If insulin sensitivity is improved nutrient partitioning appears to improve. If you have ever read the low-carb round table at T-bag Charles Poliquin posits that insulin sensitivity is more important than anabolic hormone status for muscle gain. Interesting stuff for sure!
Robb
Mike OD says
Robb,
Isn’t also one the biggest issue when it comes to insulin and fat storage the inverse relationship it has with fat burning hormones such as glucagon and growth hormone? If one has insulin resistance then the body pumps out more insulin to deal with the high blood sugar levels therefore shutting down fat burning hormones GH and glucagon. Usually right after exercise that increases insulin sensitivity fat storage is not an issue because that glucose is shuttles into the muscle cells, wheras other times with low sensitivity and high insulin fat cells are the storage house.
Mike-
Yep, this is how things like artificial sweeteners can cause havoc with fat loss. AS’s still release insulin and this shuts down lipolysis. I love the solution offered by the ADA/AMA: a 60% carb diet to keep blood glucose levels “constant”.
Robb
ec says
yes, thank you. great explanation.
Thanks EC!
Robb
Allen Yeh says
Robb,
Good post, I look forward to reading that book.
I know I’ve asked you this before but my tiny brain can’t remember the answer. AS’s impact people different, meaning some people have an insulin response and others don’t. How can you tell other than tests? Any methods you would recommend just on a purely observational basis? I don’t feel like AS’s do but that doesn’t mean I’m not being affected. I could black box it, but I just can’t stomach coffee without it!
A side note on Stevia…What are your thoughts about the study that indicated energy metabolism disruption in rats? And the reproductive thing?
Allen-
This study from Circulation seems to indicate AS’s are as bad as the full sugar versions of sodas regarding insulin resistance and the development of an ath blood profile. There is likely a dose response issue here and if one is generally insulin sensitive it likely buys a bit of lee-way with regards to AS’s and the net effect on insulin status. I’m not familiar with the stevia info, however insulin resistance deranges energy metabolism on a systemic level so that may be what is happening here.
Robb
jeet says
it was nice ……………….. i liked it
Type 1 diabetes is a debillitating disease that affects millions says
Howdy very cool web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds also?I’m happy to find numerous helpful info right here within the submit, we need work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .