The Paleolithic Solution – Episode 20

Another big day in podcast land – we have successful survived 20 episodes and Robb is still using the same jokes!  Perhaps the book release will give him some new material.

Here is the link to the Robb Wolf / Whole9 Fish Oil Calculator that we discussed during the show.

Show Topics

  1. PCBs in Fish Oil
  2. Unwanted weight gain and Paleo
  3. Obliterative Bronchiolitis
  4. Summer bulk up
  5. Satiety
  6. Testosterone replacement therapy
  7. Leaning out
  8. Cheat Meals / PCB issues / Type 1 diabetic / Paleo & kids

Show Notes – The_Paleolithic_Solution_Episode_20

The Paleolithic Solution – Episode 20

 
This entry was posted in Podcasts. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

93 Comments

  1. Chad Cilli
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    I thought so too. Though I haven’t had any fish burps. Perhaps I’ll chew a few more and see how they taste. Thanks for all your help by the way. I’ve started sleeping better already. Not quite back to normal yet, but much improved. I’m going to stick with the 80% efforts for a few weeks and I’ll give you an update. Thanks again!

  2. Jess
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Jay,

    First quote you listed says that there’s no evidence that Western disease is cause by low vegetable and fruit intake by itself. That’s not to say that high vegetable and fruit intake is bad.

    His Omega 3 comment is based off a meta-analysis, a study type that can easily be cherry picked. However, I’m not saying it’s incorrect.

    The carbohydrate part of the article seems to me to be a quantity versus quality debate. He’s saying that carbohydrate restriction in its own right does not improve weight loss or fasting insulin/glucose in the long term. This is based off people on the Atkins diet who could easily be eating bread for their minuscule allotment of carbohydrates. In my n=1, low carb eating leaves me feeling full after less food and for a longer time, and I have an especially hard time getting full off pizza (my main cheat item in the past 2 months). To summarize: Low-carb isn’t as important as what carbs you eat.
    4: There’s so little information conveyed that I really can’t tell if he means antioxidants have no positive effect at all or if they don’t increase longevity when specifically dosed in lab rats, and I do not feel like reading through the cited study to figure that out.

    I really think you’re making a mountain out of a molehill, and I believe you misinterpreted the first quote. Eating vegetables isn’t bad for you, he is simply saying that lack of them doesn’t cause Western diseases. This still all boils down to meat & vegetables, some fruit, nuts, and seeds. As Robb would say, try different things in your n=1 and see how you look, feel and perform.

  3. Matthew
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Robb, I know the timing isn’t perfect with the book and all, but a very good friend of mine was just diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Is there anything that he can do diet/supplement wise to help aid his condition, give him more energy, alleviate problems involved with radiation, etc.? Thank you so much!

  4. John Michael
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Hey Robb,

    Really diggin the podcasts. One question from #20. You recommend not taking Cod Liver Oil because the Vitamin A (Retinol) has an effect on Vit D somehow. COuld you explain this for me? I’ve only heard good things about CLO and Vit. A from the Weston A Price Foundation and you seem to contradict them. Are the bad effects of Vit. A only present with synthetically added supplements?

    Thanks

  5. Bill Strahan
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

    Quick question about maximizing effectiveness of carb intake on cortisol levels. In a nutshell, if carb intake is restricted sufficiently to require more or less continuous gluconeogenesis to maintain blood sugar, and cortisol is the pathway by which gluconeogenesis is activated, wouldn’t eating close to zero carbs result in continuously elevated cortisol levels?

    Likewise, to maximize development of muscle (occuring in reduced cortisol environment) wouldn’t the ideal, though perhaps unattainable, diet be the one that provided JUST enough carbs to nearly eliminate gluconeogenesis, thus generating the lowest levels of cortisol due to diet (all other factors being equal)? Or is my understanding of this simply immature?

  6. Chuck O
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Robb…
    Whats your take on Greek Yogurt? I’ve been playing around with it after reading a recent post on MDA, I really havn’t had any problems with it as of yet, the full fat Greek Gods style. The only other dairy product i use alot of is the Kerry Gold brand from TJ’s…thats shit is TASTY! the only negative since i’ve been filling my pie hole with the GG’s is some smelly gas..my wife is ready to sleep in a different bed.

    Thanks for your show…I’ve been flying the freak flag high in Wisconsin!

  7. Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    Chuck-
    If it seems o work for you, go for it. The pro-biotics are great.

  8. Greg
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    Note on Greek Yogurt –

    So easy to make your own for 1/4 of the cost.

    http://bitten.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/greek-yogurt/

  9. Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:29 am | Permalink

    Bill-
    I LIKE that (will look at this in a podcast as well). this is where free-eating veggies is such a good thing. Quasi-ketogenic seems so beneficial. That said, we do NOT see abnormally high cortisol levels in most folks who follow a ketogenic diet long term. Good thinking though.

  10. Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    Matthew-
    Non-hodgkins has a strong gluten association, but not this variety. I’m not sure if a ketogenic diet will help or not in this situation. It DOES seem to make normal tissue more resistant to chemotherapy, but this is all very new/unexplored stuff.

  11. Bill Strahan
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    Robb, second question then: Do you think the process of gluconeogenesis and ketosis are close to a perfect overlap, meaning that if I am in ketosis then I am also undergoing gluconeogenesis? Burning ketones for fuel doesn’t necessarily seem to mean to me that I’m also having to create glucose to elevate blood sugar to maintain it, but perhaps it does.

    If that’s the case, and I’m wanting to steadily burn bodyfat while keeping cortisol to a minimum, I would think I’d want to be riding that line between ketosis and not in ketosis. In other words, cycling between turning a Ketostix deep purple and not at all is going to result in elevated cortisol and perhaps some muscle breakdown to feed the gluconeogenesis, whereas just barely being in and out of ketosis would indicate less fat is being broken down but might preserve more muscle and reduce cortisol.

    And I suppose another question as well is do the ketone bodies appear when fat is broken down to provide glycerol for gluconeogenesis as well?

    Maybe it’s all just one and the same process, I don’t know.

  12. Jay
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Hey Robb,
    Been reading about the Okinawans and had a question. They are the longest lived people, have the fewest amount of disease and senility, and maintain the most functionality into old age. It is not uncommon for them to live well into the 90s and sometimes even higher, with no disease and fully self sufficient. The authors have noted that they eat a diet which seems to me to be pretty paleo except for the fact that they consume a pretty large number of whole grains. Given what I know about grains, how is this possible?

  13. Mary
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    Hey Robb,

    With regards to satiety, one of the things that I noticed I feel much more satiety when I eat liver, ever had someone notice that?. I would say I am not carb tolerant, though. I wonder if it heavy dose of vitamin/minerals with it?

    Mary

  14. Ian
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Hey Robb,
    I recently came across this post as quoted from the book “good calories, bad calories”

    “Look at this another way. When Bruce Bistrian and George Blackburn instructed their patients to eat nothing byt lean meat, fish, and fowl-650 to 800 calories a day of fat and protein-half of them lost at least forty pounds each. That success rate held true for “thousands of patients” from the 1970s on, Bistrian said. “It’s an extraordinarily effective and safe way to get large amounts of weight loss.” But had they chosen to balance these very low-calorie diets of fat and protein with carbohydrates-say, by adding another 400 calories of “wonderful fruits and vegetables,” as Bistrian phrased it-they would then be consuming the kind of semi-starvation diet that inevitably fails: 1,200 calories evenly balanced between protein, fat, and carbohydrates. “The likelihood of losing forty pounds on that diet is one percent,” Bistrian said.

    The bottom line: If we add 400 calories of fat and protein to 800 calories of fat and protein, we have a 1,200-calorie high-fat, carbohydrate-restricted diet that will still result in considerable weight loss. If we add 400 calories of carbohydrates to the 800 calories of fat and protein, we have a balanced semi-starvation diet of the kind commonly recommended to treat obesity-and we reduce the efficacy by a factor of fifty. We now have a diet that will induce forty pounds of weight loss in perhaps one in a hundred patients rather than one in two.”

    so if one were looking to lean out, do you think it would be best to drop the green veggies, etc? 50 g carbs comes out to 200 cals, not quite the 400 mentioned here, but I wonder if it may be a factor.

  15. Chad Cilli
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Robb,

    I have to ask now. Just made it through the podcast. On the testosterone replacement therapy, I believe the number given was 315ng/dl, and he’s a 40 year old male. He said his doctor recommended said that was low and wanted him to start testosterone therapy. Thing is…. I’m 350ng/dl at 26 years old and my doc said that was a normal number. Am I missing something? What is the cut off for low T? Thanks Robb!

  16. Posted March 26, 2010 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Re Vitamin A in cod liver oil.
    The ratio of preformed vitamin A to D is too high – vitamin A blocks the vitamin D

    This vitamin D council newsletter looks at some of the studies.
    http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/newsletter/vitamin-d-vitamin-a-and-cancer.shtml
    Mercola also explains it here
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/16/warning-new-proof-confirms-if-you-take-this-supplement-vitamin-d-will-not-work-as-well.aspx

  17. Posted March 26, 2010 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Vitamin A excess blocks Vitamin D action:
    Here is another Vitamin D council explanation:
    http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/newsletter/2008-december.shtml

  18. Geoff
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    On the inedible topic of plastic bags, pollution and endocrine disruption -
    Don’t know about rest of Europe but the small wet island(s) of Britain still give away plastic bags at the majority of stores. One of the mainstream (and most expensive) supermarkets and most independent ‘health’ food stores charge for bags (made from corn and they break before you get home), all the others are hanging back on making a decision.
    Tend to carry rucksack by default so usually not an issue – can’t see it taking off unless charging is introduced across the board.

    Rob will you discuss xenoestrogens (estrogen analogs) at some point?

  19. noah
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Robb, might be interesting to you, adds a nice perspective to the food we eat. (or dont eat)

    http://www.wisegeek.com/what-does-200-calories-look-like.htm

  20. Jim
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 6:54 am | Permalink

    Holy Cats!

    Another awesome episode, guys.

    Rob – idea for you: Throw a chapter in your book on paleo for infants/children and even nursing mothers.

    My wife and I love when you talk about this in these podcasts as we went paleo right after the birth of our first child. He is eating solids now and is all paleo. Super healthy, no gut irritation, no (excessively) stinky poops. Other kids his age on rice and what not are sickly, have ear infecions, etc. We’re not sure its all paleo related, but in our pseudo-scientific house this is the reason we hang our hat on!

    All the best. Looking forward to the book, man.

    Farley

  21. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:26 am | Permalink

    Farley-
    I touch on this a bit, but I’ll see about fleshing it out a bit.

  22. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    geoff-
    Will do.

  23. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:30 am | Permalink

    Chad-
    might be some confusion in free vs. total T.

  24. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:32 am | Permalink

    Ian-
    I’d keep the veggies. Tough to get 400 cals of veggies!

  25. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    Mary-
    never heard that, makes sense.

  26. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    Jay-
    this is the misconception, they historically did NOT eat much grains. Yams/tubbers (bright orange, nutrient dense) was the norm.

  27. Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:36 am | Permalink

    Bill-
    Ketosis does not necessarily going to mean high gluconeogenesis and remember, gluconeogenesis is not singularly controlled by cortisol.

  28. Ian
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Hey Robb,
    I’m dealing w/ what is most likely high cortisol levels from metcons I believe. I am starting the 531 wendler program tomorrow and I have a couple of questions I’d like your opinion if u don’t mind. First, do you think it would be wise to begin w/ a deload week (coming off mebb for the last two months) and secondly I saw u were doing sprints on the wendler program as he recommends. Do u think that double unders are a suitable substitute without taxing the system like metcons do?

    Thank you sir….
    Ian

  29. Paul Klein
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    I have a question for the podcast.

    Robb and Andy have mentioned a few times about taking digestive enzymes to aid in food absorption. James Fitzgerald also brings this up in his Nutrition 201 DVD. I found this article on Polquin’s website that explains how it works and how to figure out how many pills are required.

    http://www.charlespoliquin.com/ArticlesMultimedia/Articles/Article.aspx?ID=27

    However, I also found this post on T-Nation. Basically debunking the Polquin article.

    http://tnation.tmuscle.com/free_online_forum/diet_performance_nutrition_supplements/rebuttal_to_charles_poliquins_article_on_stomach_acid_;jsessionid=07F9B13D005ED261C25160C58536A553.hydra

    I eat strict paleo, sleep 7.5 to 8.5 hours a night and follow OPTs workouts (so I do have periodization and get proper rest). I am desperate to improve my athletic performance (I missed qualifying for Regionals by 3 spots) and I was hoping that proper food absorption might be my missing link. I did the enzyme test and got the warm feeling at 6 pills (now food super enzymes). So 5 pills each meal is my lucky number.

    Long question shortened…Is Polquin right about these enzymes or is the MD from T-Nation right and I am wasting my time?

  30. Tom
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    The new China study. “China becomes world’s new diabetes capital”. Man I never expted to see that headline. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62N66220100324

    Tom

  31. Scott L
    Posted March 28, 2010 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    Hey Guys,

    Another great show, thought I would throw out an update since iodine came up in the podcast. I am the hockey player that didn’t want to gain weight from podcast 6 or 7. I still weight in the 215 range with around 10% BF however I started uping my carb intake with some yams, potatoes and fruit. Was previously below 50g/day, now not too sure maybe 150+. I also started iodine supplementation. Anyway played in a tournement last week and it was the best I have felt in a year on the ice, at least until the beer consumption caught up to me on day 3(I am getting old). Not sure what turned it around though since I upped carbs for a week with no change then I started the iodine. Pretty close together though so I have confounded any conclusion, just keep rolling with both and see what happens. Thanks for all the work and eagerly anticipating the book.

    Scott

  32. Posted March 29, 2010 at 6:33 am | Permalink

    Heard this on NPR today….thought you might like it.

    Are We Overselling The Sunshine Vitamin?
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125226703

  33. Posted March 29, 2010 at 6:49 am | Permalink

    Tom-
    I saw that. OOPS!

  34. Posted March 29, 2010 at 6:51 am | Permalink

    Ian-
    I like the time off idea and I REALLY enjoy the sprints. I split time between flat, acceleration work and hill work for conditioning. I rotate in 20-30 min of thai-kicks and bag work if the weather is shite. I like the jump-rope idea but do more than double unders! get some skills and make it fun.

  35. Jeffrey M
    Posted March 29, 2010 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Main-site posted the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s write-up on the demarcation between “science” and “pseudo-science.” I’ll admit that I didn’t read the whole thing – just thought it was worth sharing!

    ” ‘Pseudoscience’ and ‘pseudoscientific’ are unavoidably defamatory words (Laudan 1983, 118; Dolby 1987, 204). It would be as strange for someone to proudly describe her own activities as pseudoscience as to boast that they are bad science. Since the derogatory connotation is an essential characteristic of the word ‘pseudoscience’, an attempt to extricate a value-free definition of the term would not be meaningful. An essentially value-laden term has to be defined in value-laden terms. This is often difficult since the specification of the value component tends to be controversial.”

    Rob and Andy, THANK YOU for everything you do. Love the podcast, appreciate all the great information, and looking forward to the book.

    Thanks again!
    Jeffrey

  36. Ian
    Posted March 29, 2010 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    cool thanks Robb. Are short (under 5 min metcons) a bad idea when recovering from high cortisol (overtrainin) or can I work one or two in per week as long as they are not very long in duration. I am having a hard time giving up fran or as many burpees as possible in 5 min. two of my favorites…..

  37. Posted March 30, 2010 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Ian-
    If you really want this stuff to get better do nothing “met-con-esque” for several months. Keep your relative perceived effort in the 75-85% range when you do come back and you will make great progress and not burn out. Intensity is for peaking and or when people need to learn what intensity is. It’s NOT for everyday.

  38. Posted March 30, 2010 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Jeffry-
    I had a few folks shoot that to me. I think this is a bit like feminists trying to take back words like C@$T and bitch. The whole thing is ironic on many levels, not the least of which how much people REVEL in the pseudo-science of evolutionary biology and the paleolithic diet. And all this while the Zone is still the preferred point of reference for HQ!

    The irony is amazing and they do not even see it.

  39. Ian
    Posted March 30, 2010 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Thanks so much Robb. I will do that for sure. Be sure to let us know when we can pre order that book as I will be the first one in line;)

  40. Ian
    Posted April 1, 2010 at 7:02 am | Permalink

    So since sprints are preferred to metcons when recovering from overtraining, would you want to have full recovery between sprints?

  41. Posted April 1, 2010 at 8:09 am | Permalink

    Ian-
    yep.

  42. Ian
    Posted April 1, 2010 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    One more Robb, so doing a program like wendler’s 531, even though there are some max effort aspects to it, is cool while trying to get the adrenals and cortisol back in order? Along w/ sleep and solid paleo nutrition of course……and lots of fish oil, magnesium and vid D.

  43. Posted April 1, 2010 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Ian-
    it SHOULD be ok, but this is all situation dependent! That “max effort” might need to be 80% still. The point is to make deposits, not withdrawals to the system. You’ve gotta leave something in the tank.

One Trackback

  1. By 03/25/10 – Strength & Sprints Day 25 on March 24, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    [...] Robb Wolf’s Paleolithic Solution – Episode 20 [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*